Amaryllis Fox
RFK Jr in-law bimbo candidate for CIA Deputy Director?
Update: Feb 15, 2025
Fox named to President’s Intelligence Advisory Board (PIAB).
"The members are “a distinguished and trusted group of Patriots” who will advise the president on governing national security and other Intelligence Community (IC) work, according to the announcement released by the White House.
"Trump chose the appointees to the group because of their range of experience, according to the statement. The White House stated that it hopes that the board will “help restore integrity to our Intelligence Community.”
"The committee members include former California congressman Devin Nunes, who will serve as the group’s chair. Other members include Scott Glabe, Amaryllis Fox Kennedy, Brad Robert Wenstrup, Wayne Berman, Reince Priebus, Robert O’Brien, Joshua Lobel, Sander R. Gerber, Katie Miller, Jeremy Katz, and Thomas Ollis Hicks Jr."
Ludicrous!
_______________________________
The Conservative Treehouse’s Sundance posted today:
RFK Jr Making Moves Inside Transition Team to Position Daughter in Law as Deputy CIA Nominee
That post is based on this Axios article:
Scoop: RFK Jr. pushes his daughter-in-law for CIA deputy director
I’ve watched Amaryllis Fox’s aggressive marketing campaign since she published a book, ostensibly about her experiences as a CIA NOC, with amazement and amusement.
Amazing because of her audacity—publishing details about her classified affiliation and her supposed operations. Amusing because her claimed operations were clearly exaggerated, inflated, and part-fantasized.
A very close friend was a contractor in the office that hired Amaryllis Fox in the Agency.
She was hired in the first flush of recruits that came in after 9/11—my friend was involved in the program that brought them in under unusual covers, and knew her. She was a typical hire of that time--a young, attractive girl with little to no useful skills (the main qualification of one of her classmates was that she was a model). Agency managers (middle-aged guys) loved to have this profile in their offices.
She published a book about her time in the CIA--without Agency review. The stories in her book of operating in Pakistan, meeting terrorists, are not credible. Her stories of training, and her cover are real. But her operations look to be 75% imaginary.
That she was not faced with lawsuits/arrest for publishing her CIA work without Agency review is very telling.
The Agency, when she published her book, was in its initial stage of descent into PC-Prog/Neocon Trump Derangement Syndrome, under John Brennan. They purged some who had publicly criticized Brennan and his actions as Obama's Terrorism Czar. They were in the planning stages and early operational phases of the inter-agency scam now known as Russiagate. The fact that Fox was not pursued by the Agency after publishing her book tells us that she is politically protected, likely because of her political affiliations/beliefs, also probably because of her protected sex.
In 2008, another CIA NOC officer published a book about the Agency's NOC program, also without Agency review, a scathing expose of the Agency's management and dysfunction:
The NOC, who used the pseudonym Ishmael Jones, fought years of legal battles with the CIA, until in 2012, courts found against him, and the CIA seized all the proceeds from Jones' book.
"A federal judge has ruled a CIA whistle-blower will have to forfeit any future money he earns from a scathing book he wrote about the spy agency after he failed to get approval from his former employer prior to publication.
The CIA accused the officer of breaking his secrecy agreement with the U.S., and the court agreed.
So, there is recent precedent to show that the Agency will pursue and punish former officers who step around review requirements. Yet, Fox parades around the globe, babbling her ludicrous claims to be Jane Bond, and faces no consequences. Clearly a political darling of the Brennan crowd, and just two years ago, was likely immersed in the PC-Prog political miasma. Absolutely NOT MAGA, nor anything even close.
Amaryllis Fox should not be allowed within a thousand miles of anything President Trump or his administration deals with, whether intelligence or any other issue.
Excellent analysis and commentary.
The CIA should be DO-centric. But, for that to work, there has to be a functioning DO. Is it too late to reform the DO?
In 2025, there is an entire generation in the DO, who have been hired, trained, operated, and are now retiring, all under the PC-Progressive politicized, DEI umbrella.
Thirty years after the Cat B women's settlement, and nearly 20 years after Obama's pet, Brennan politicized the Agency, case officers are rewarded and promoted not for their abilities or successes, but for what's between their legs, or the color of their skin, or other political categories.
The Khost bombing is the epitome of PC-Prog incompetence in the DO. PC Killed 7 at Khost. The out-of-embassy push, and the demands to on-board diverse case officer candidates, resulted in hiring young females with little to no useful experience--like Amaryllis Fox, and one whose qualifications were mainly that she'd been a fashion model.
That generation is now senior management. They're the ones who'll be reforming the CIA, if ever such an effort comes to fruition. Whatever "reforms" they might put in place are unlikely to be what's needed to right the ship.
The only possibility for actual, fundamental, needed reform is a reformation guided by an unaligned outside group of experts. Something like DOGE for the DO. Audit, gather data, slash and burn, visualize excellence, and rebuild to achieve excellence. Rebuilding will require revamped recruiting and training and operations, as well as reforming the organization.
That's a tall order. But without it, the CIA will continue to be the foundation of the Deep State, the politicized, hidden federal bureaucracy with a mission of resisting the will of American voters, to perpetuate anti-American, PC-Progressive political goals--NOT the security of our country.